Many Ontario commercial tenants have a clause in their lease saying they own all improvements and can remove them when they leave. But the legal distinction...
A trade fixture is an item attached to the premises for the purpose of the tenant's business — like retail shelving, restaurant equipment, or dental chairs. The tenant has a common law right to remove trade fixtures at lease end. A leasehold improvement is a permanent modification to the building itself — like walls, flooring, electrical wiring, or plumbing. Under default common law rules, leasehold improvements belong to the landlord even if the tenant paid for them.
Not under common law alone. The default rule is that leasehold improvements become part of the building and belong to the landlord. However, if the lease contains a clause expressly granting the tenant ownership of improvements and the right to remove them, the tenant can override the default — provided the clause is properly drafted and does not conflict with other provisions in the lease.
A strong clause defines what it covers (trade fixtures, leasehold improvements, or both), states ownership expressly, grants the right to remove, addresses the restoration obligation, and ideally attaches a schedule listing every item. Clauses that use vague language like "tenant's property" without defining the term, or that conflict with restoration provisions elsewhere in the lease, are vulnerable to challenge.
A restoration clause (also called a "make good" or "surrender" clause) requires the tenant to return the premises to their original condition at lease end. This can make removal rights economically pointless: if you have the right to take out custom flooring but must install replacement flooring in its place, the cost of restoration may exceed the value of what you removed. Negotiate to limit restoration to repairing damage from removal rather than full reinstatement.
A tenant who remains in possession after lease expiry — even just to finish removal work — is an overholding tenant. Many commercial leases set overholding rent at 150% to 200% of regular rent. Courts have enforced this strictly. All removal and restoration work must be completed before the lease expires, or the tenant should negotiate a written extension in advance.
Ontario's Commercial Tenancies Act gives landlords a right of distress — the ability to seize a tenant's chattels on the premises to satisfy rent arrears. Trade fixtures are generally exempt from distress under common law because, while affixed, they are treated as part of the realty rather than as chattels. However, once severed from the premises they resume their character as chattels and may be distrainable. The safest course is to ensure all rent is current before beginning removal.
The foundational test comes from Stack v. T. Eaton Co. (1902) and has two parts: the degree of annexation (how firmly the item is attached) and the object of annexation (whether it was attached to improve the building or for the better use of the item itself). The purpose test is considered more important. Items attached for the tenant's trade purposes are presumptively removable trade fixtures.
Yes. Lease language is often inconsistent — one section may grant removal rights while another requires all improvements to become the landlord's property at lease end. A legal professional can identify conflicts, advise on your actual rights, and help you avoid costly mistakes like triggering a full restoration obligation or overholding rent.
Legal Assist Paralegal Services — Licensed by the Law Society of Ontario. Serving London, Ontario and Southwestern Ontario. Call 226-272-5153 or email jeanfrancois@legalassist.london for a free consultation.